Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 15(4): e38172, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20237643

ABSTRACT

A 65-year-old male patient presented to the ED complaining of blurred vision in the left eye for the last three days. The patient had just recovered from COVID-19 infection and had a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test two days after the initiation of symptoms. His family and medical history were clear. Ophthalmological examination and imaging revealed branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema in the left eye, while the right eye was normal. The visual acuity was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/36 in the left eye. Laboratory tests, as well as the full cardiovascular and thrombophilia evaluation, were normal. Since the patient did not have known risk factors for BRVO, we hypothesize that it was related to COVID-19 infection. However, the causality between the two entities remains under investigation.

2.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 42: 103556, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265855

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in retinal microcirculation in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection compared to healthy controls, using optical coherence tomography-angiography. METHODS: Meta-analysis of eligible studies comparing retinal microcirculation between patients recovered from COVID-19 infection and healthy controls up to 7th of September 2022 was performed, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 guidelines. The following search algorithm was used: (COVID-19 OR coronavirus) AND (retina OR optical coherence tomography OR optical coherence tomography angiography OR vessel density OR foveal avascular zone). Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to compare continuous variables. Revman 5.3 was used for the analysis. RESULTS: 12 studies were included in our analysis. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was larger in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection compared to healthy controls, while there was no statistically significant difference in FAZ perimeter between the two groups. The foveal, parafoveal and whole image vessel density in the superficial capillary plexus showed no significant difference between the two groups. The foveal, parafoveal and whole image vessel density in the deep capillary plexus was statistically lower in patients recovered from COVID-19 compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: FAZ area was enlarged and foveal, parafoveal and whole image vessel density in deep capillary plexus were reduced in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection compared to healthy controls, suggesting that COVID-19 infection may induce long-term retinal microvascular changes in patients recovered from the virus infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Photochemotherapy , Humans , Retinal Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Fluorescein Angiography/methods , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents , Retina/diagnostic imaging , Fovea Centralis/blood supply , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods
3.
Cureus ; 13(5): e14831, 2021 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1239153

ABSTRACT

Purpose To evaluate the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related lockdown in the management of patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR), including diabetic macular edema (DME), in a tertiary reference center in Greece. Methods In this retrospective study, we first compared the number of patients who were diagnosed with DR or DME in our clinic during the period of the lockdown and during the same period of the previous year. In addition, we included consecutive patients with DR or DME, who were followed up and treated regularly in our clinic and their appointments deferred due to lockdown, so as to compare the visual acuity, fundoscopy, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings prior to and post lockdown. Results During the lockdown period, there was a statistically significant decrease in patients with DR and DME as compared to the same period in the previous year. Regarding patients with previously diagnosed DME, there was a statistically significant worsening in their visual acuity and central retinal thickness after lockdown as compared to the last visit before lockdown (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Concerning patients diagnosed with DR and without DME before lockdown, 30% of patients with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NDPR) and 8.3% of patients with quiescent proliferative DR (PDR) progressed to active PDR while four out of 107 patients (3.7%) developed DME during the lockdown. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that only the time interval between the last visit before lockdown and the first visit after the lockdown was associated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change (p=0.017). Conclusions The COVID-19-related lockdown was related to the postponement in patient care, which resulted in significantly worse visual acuity outcomes in patients with DR.

4.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 105(12): 1738-1743, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-873487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed barriers to retinal care delivery worldwide. In this context, retinal services are exploring novel ways to ensure access to healthcare. METHODS: We conducted a worldwide survey among retinal specialists between March 31, 2020 and April 12, 2020. The expert survey was developed on the basis of focus group discussions involving retinal specialists and literature searches. It included 44 questions on alternative ways of care provision including digital health domains such as teleophthalmology, home monitoring or decentralised patient care. RESULTS: 214 retinal experts participated in the survey, of which 120 (56.1%) had more than 15 years of experience in ophthalmology. Most participants were clinicians (n=158, 73.9%) practising in Western Europe (n=159, 74%). In the majority of institutions, teleophthalmology, home monitoring and decentralised patient care have not been implemented before the pandemic (n=46, 21.8.1%; n=64, 29.9%; n=38, 19.1%). During the pandemic, the use of teleophthalmology and home monitoring increased significantly (n=105, p<0.001; n=90, p<0.001). In the subgroup of institutions reporting no teleophthalmology service before and implementing a service during the pandemic (34/70, 48.6%), reimbursement was the sole significant parameter (OR 9.62 (95% CI 2.42 to 38.16); p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Digital health is taking the centre stage tackling unpreceded challenges of retinal care delivery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and may sustainably change the way we practice ophthalmology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Attitude , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Eye (Lond) ; 35(5): 1459-1466, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-640465

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed measures of social distancing and barriers in delivery of "in person" education. Institutions, involved in training the next generation of ophthalmologists, are using alternative teaching methods to maintain the standard of education. METHODS: We conducted a worldwide survey among physicians, who are actively involved in Ophthalmology-related education, between 3 and 14 April 2020. The expert survey, developed on the basis of literature search and focus group discussions, comprised 23 questions addressing the use of e-learning in Ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 321 participants from both academic and non-academic institutions worldwide, with variable practice experience and expertise, completed the survey. Before the pandemic, the majority of participants used traditional training modalities, including lectures, grand rounds and journal clubs, and 48% did not use any e-learning. There was a statistically significant increase in the use of all e-learning alternatives during the pandemic (p < 0.001), associated mainly with the availability of e-learning facilities (p < 0.001) and the academic character of institutions (p < 0.001). Zoom® was recognized as the mostly used platform for virtual teaching. Although theoretical teaching may take place, the surgical training of residents/fellows was dramatically reduced. The latter was significantly associated with participants' perspectives about teaching practices (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic imposed great challenges in the educational field of Ophthalmology. The experience related to virtual training in Ophthalmology, gained during the pandemic, may change the traditional teaching practices in the world and provide new educational opportunities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Curriculum , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL